Comments on: Boardgame: Arkham Horror

By: Ron

Ron — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:53:11 +0000

That’s an interesting claim. What was illogical about them? What makes the rules of Catan logical in contrast? In any game system which relies on arbitrary rules (which is almost every game on the planet), so long as the rules don’t contradict (ie, CalvinBall, even then, they are conforming to the rule-less rule), I don’t think they can be described as illogical.

By: David

David — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:33:35 +0000

The rules in Tigris and Euphrates aren’t logical.

By: Ron

Ron — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:29:36 +0000

David isn’t nerdy enough to handle the harder core games. I tried to show him Tigris & Euphrates and it was a disaster.

By: David

David — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:51:56 +0000

Settlers of Catan is better, where the “ultimate evil” is monopoly, collusion, and communism. It can only be defeated by strong competition and free trade! HAIL AYN RAND!!!!!!!!